|
|
The recent statements by David Babayan, once a long-time
advocate of separatist positions, now invoking international law and human
rights language, appear to mark a notable shift in tone.
His appeals to legal norms and references to “procedural
violations” and “political vendetta” contrast sharply with his previous
rhetoric over many years.
This sudden change in discourse has drawn attention, as it
comes at a moment of legal accountability, raising questions about whether it
reflects a genuine reassessment of views or is primarily driven by personal
circumstances.
Print version