|
|
The harsh speech
delivered by President Ilham Aliyev in Zangilan on May 10 was listened to very
carefully in neighboring Armenia, where the election campaign is underway.
Those who
romanticize and idealize the "heroism", "humanism",
"creativity" and other qualities of the occupiers are terribly
outraged. They did not like that they were, roughly speaking, stuck in the
dirt, which, instead of romance, accompanied the Armenian aggression and the
years of occupation. Our neighbors, in fact, have absolutely nothing to be
proud of. Is it possible to be proud of what the invaders have done on
Azerbaijani lands? One must have an extremely perverted imagination to see
romance in ethnic cleansing, total destruction and desecration of graves. You
don't have to have any morals to be proud of the crimes against humanity
committed by the Armenian separatists and occupiers over the past thirty years.
And you also need to have boundless shamelessness in order to commit so many
atrocities and try to demonize your neighbor.
Much of the
Azerbaijani President's speech struck a chord with the revanchists. These
figures have a very delicate mental organization, they are very easy to offend.
Especially the truth. Our neighbors are always offended when the Azerbaijani
side reminds them of their black deeds during the years of military aggression
and subsequent occupation. They don't want to hear about genocide, ethnic
cleansing, vandalism, looting. When they are reminded of this, the entire
revanchist fraternity rears up, starts waving their arms and, spluttering
saliva, threatening Baku with international courts. Having such a bloody
background as that of the Armenians, one should swallow one's tongue, but the
habit is stronger. The neighbors are used to blaming those who suffered from
their actions for their crimes. The whole world is talking about the
"Armenian genocide", although in fact the victims of the genocide
were just the peaceful Turkish population. Now they want the whole world to cry
about the "genocide of 2023", and instead the world listens to what
Baku says.
What Baku says
needs to be known not so much to the world as to the Armenian people
themselves, deceived by propaganda tinsel. The older generation of citizens of
the neighboring country knows perfectly well that Baku is telling the truth.
This truth is not told to young people who continue to be proud of the bloody
deeds of their fathers. But in vain. This is difficult, and it will inevitably
lead to certain national-scale complexes, but the Armenian society will have to
go through this stage of reconciliation with reality. In the end, everything
will get better, and the truth about what the "winners" were doing
after the "restoration of historical justice" will no longer cause
hysterical denial.
It was the
hysterical denial that caused the truth about the looting of Armenians in the
occupied territories of Azerbaijan. The Head of State said that every nation
has good and bad people, but the overall picture is as follows: "Zangilan
was razed to the ground not only by the leaders of Armenia, not only by
Karabakh separatists. Almost their entire population came here en masse and
engaged in looting. They even said, "We're going to rob." That is, it
was their rule, it was normal behavior. That is, wildness was normal behavior -
who would steal the most stones, who would take out how many window frames or
roofing materials. Then they brought it and sold it in the markets of both Iran
and Armenia. That's the difference. Could we do that? Our people wouldn't even
think of that."
And so it was.
The massive looting that befell the lands of Azerbaijan occupied by Armenia
during and after the First Karabakh War probably knows no equal in scale and
cynicism. The invaders dragged everything that had been abandoned by the
fleeing Azerbaijanis, from bricks and furniture to towels and cutlery. They
were dragged not only by separatists and armed gangs, but also by ordinary
Armenian citizens who came by truck to the occupied lands specifically for the
purpose of looting. It was a common occurrence.
Let's continue
with examples.
After the Khojaly
genocide, Russian journalist Ivleeva was allowed into the city by the Armenians
and filmed what was happening there. Her camera caught men carrying bales of
Khojaly residents' property. These are residents of neighboring Armenian villages
who were waiting for the city to be cleared of residents in order to enter and
rob quietly. No one bothers them, because it's a common thing for them.
One of the
Armenian social media users named Sevak, who fought in the First Karabakh War,
once wrote that during the occupation of Shusha in May 1992, the invaders who
entered the city saw Armenian looters who were already actively looting
abandoned houses. The looters entered the city even before the armed gangs and
calmly did their job while the battle was going on. This scene made a strong
impression on poor Sevak. Therefore, he writes openly and reminds us that after
the occupation, the Armenians looted the largest irrigation system in the South
Caucasus, dismantled the railway tracks, and sold them for scrap.
It is significant
that the habit of looting affects not only the hated Azerbaijanis, but also
their own tribesmen. Thus, when leaving Kalbajar and Lachin, the Armenians who
illegally lived there plundered the houses of their neighbors. Blogger Vartan
Ghukasyan posted a video of looted Armenian houses before the liberation of
Lachin. The blogger admitted that he was shocked. Robbery, he said, was putting
it mildly. A robbery is called when electrical equipment, gold and money are
taken out of houses. "But I do not know what word to find for the fact
that windows, doors, tiles and toilets were taken out of houses. There is no
definition of this in any language. And the most important thing is that it was
not the Turks (Azerbaijanis - ed.) who did it, but the Armenians themselves! As
soon as they heard that Berdzor (Lachin) was being rented, they rushed to empty
the houses. They didn't even realize that Armenians still live in these
houses," Ghukasyan was horrified, admitting that there are "a lot of
scum among the Armenians, the number of which continues to increase."
The same thing
happened in Kalbajar before the Armenians left the area. Armenian journalists
and bloggers wrote about it with shock, although it is unclear what shocked
them so much. If looters have destroyed all Azerbaijani settlements in the
occupied territories for 27 years, then why don't they take the property of
their tribesmen if it is badly stored? The Armenian media wrote about the
looting recorded in Kalbajar as a "disgusting phenomenon." And the
most interesting thing is that Armenians who came from neighboring Vardenis
also participated in this event specifically in order to have time to profit
from other people's goods before joining the Kalbajar Azerbaijani Army.
The nationalists
were very offended by the story of journalist Natalie Aleksanyan. She once
shared her memories of her childhood during the first war. She herself
witnessed how, after the occupation, the villagers of Armenia drove trucks to
the occupied Azerbaijani lands in order to plunder the villages abandoned by
the Azerbaijanis. She admitted that she still does not understand why her
tribesmen took everything from the houses of Azerbaijanis, down to the dishes.
She also does not understand how graves could be desecrated and destroyed, how
corpses could be dug up in search of gold.
We don't
understand it either, and we never will.
Shocking facts
also occurred after the catastrophic earthquake in Armenia in 1988. The looters
were here before anyone else, before the rescuers and the military. We won't
say anything, just give quotes from eyewitness accounts published in the
Russian media over the years.:
"Looters are
prowling in houses abandoned by people. They caught one in front of me, almost
trampled to death. The military barely recaptured it. The worst thing is that
not only houses are being robbed, but also the dead."
"No one was
really there yet, neither rescuers nor the military, they entered the city only
two days later. But looters were already scurrying through the ruins."..
The neighbors
would very much like to respond to what the Azerbaijani leader said in Zangilan
in substance. But this is impossible, because the Azerbaijanis behaved
differently. Azerbaijani soldiers did not plunder houses abandoned by Armenians
during the 44-day war. Residents of Azerbaijani villages were in no hurry to
steal the property of Armenians. As the President said, there are both good and
bad people in every nation. The family is not without a freak. The main thing
is that this ugliness does not turn into a part of the national idea.
And that's
exactly what happened in Armenia. How, when, and why is not our concern.
Print version