|
|
An interesting correspondence discussion arose between the
Foreign Ministers of Turkiye and Armenia. She deserves attention.
Speaking in parliament the other day, Turkish Minister Hakan
Fidan said that Turkiye is ready to normalize relations with Armenia when Baku
and Yerevan sign a final peace agreement. Fidan made it very clear that if the
Turkish-Armenian normalization takes place before the signing of peace, then
the main reason why Armenia should sign a peace agreement with Azerbaijan will
be eliminated. "Therefore, there is a possibility that we will face a
frozen conflict in the region. We don't want that," said Hakan Fidan.
Recently, official Yerevan has often made statements that
the issue of opening borders with Turkiye is almost resolved, the parties are
actively discussing and demonstrating mutual understanding. Prime Minister
Nikol Pashinyan said earlier that it was only a matter of time. However, the
statement of the Turkish Foreign Minister says that not everything is as simple
as the Armenian side would like to think. The latter expected that with the
establishment of a dialogue with Baku, it would automatically solve all
problems with Ankara. As it turned out, Ankara continues to adhere to the
previous opinion, which is as follows: solve all the problems with Azerbaijan,
and we will open the border.
We can agree with Nikol Pashinyan when he says that the
clear signs of peace are that there has been no shooting on the border for
almost two years, and the parties are discussing the delimitation and launch of
communications. Of course, all this is true. But there is a fundamental
question that determines how strong this beautiful and inspiring superstructure
will be and how long it will last. In a situation of "neither war nor
peace," recent achievements, no matter how good they may be, may begin to
crack.
Azerbaijan is making steps forward not out of altruism, but
in order to speed up the solution of the main tasks, first of all, the signing
of a peace treaty that will put an end to all Armenian claims to Azerbaijani
lands once and for all and ensure lasting peace for future generations. One
word from the current Armenian authorities is not enough here. Guarantees are
needed, and Armenian legislation should provide them. Pashinyan postpones
amendments to the Constitution and the implementation of the Zangezur Corridor
for the period after the parliamentary elections. This means that we should not
expect these issues to be resolved until the second half of next year. What
does it mean? This means that the signing of the peace treaty is also
postponed. Official Baku has repeatedly stressed that the presence of claims in
the Basic Law of the Republic of Armenia on the territory of Azerbaijan (as
well as Turkiye) creates obstacles to the conclusion of a guaranteed peace. Our
country cannot sign peace in conditions when these claims are constitutionally
confirmed in Armenia and constitutionally prohibited from changes.
This has already been said so many times that we will not go
into details once again.
The next postponement of the implementation of the Zangezur
Corridor project, called TRIPP after the Washington meeting, is also an
obstacle to speeding up the peace process. Nikol Pashinyan has already
announced that construction will begin after the elections. In his statement,
Hakan Fidan made it clear that the Turkish border will open after the Armenian
elections. And this is absolutely true.
Armenia, which has been left unpunished for its crimes
thanks to Baku's far-sighted approach to the region's future, has decided that
it can expect to receive more than it gives away.
Let's take a look. So far, all the steps taken by Yerevan
have been taken under pressure and in light of the lack of room for maneuver.
Armenia could not help but return four villages last spring, because then it
would have lost more. She also agreed to restore communications through Meghri
only after the American side joined the pressure. As a gesture of goodwill in
response to this forced but correct step by Yerevan, Baku opened transit to
Armenia through its territory. As a response, Nikol Pashinyan suggested that
Azerbaijan use the highway running from Turkiye to the Azerbaijani border for
transit to Turkiye. Both of these borders are currently closed to Armenia. If
Pashinyan hoped to speed up the opening of the border with Turkiye in this way,
then the hopes are unlikely to be fulfilled. Firstly, because Baku did not
appreciate the "gift". Baku expects Yerevan to accelerate the
implementation of the Zangezur project, or, if someone likes it better, TRIPP.
He does not need any other roads through Armenia.
And the second reason was outlined by the Turkish Foreign
Minister himself, speaking in parliament.
Armenian journalists have asked Armenian Foreign Minister
Ararat Mirzoyan to comment on Fidan's words.
To be fair, Mirzoyan used all his diplomatic skills to avoid
saying anything superfluous. But he's wrong about the most important thing.
Throughout the years of the conflict, the Armenian side has maintained that the
Karabakh conflict and normalization with Turkiye are unrelated processes. From
this conviction, "football diplomacy" was born, which ended in
nothing, as the processes turned out to be connected even more than Yerevan
wanted to think.
Armenian diplomacy makes the same mistake today. Yerevan
must realize the existence of these cause-and-effect relationships. Turkiye once
closed the border due to the Armenian aggression against its sister country,
but for thirty years it has not opened it, despite serious pressure on Ankara
from both the west and the east. The region is stable now, there is no conflict
anymore, but there is also no officially signed peace. All that the Armenian
side needs to do is to remove all remaining obstacles on the way to signing a
peace treaty. They have been repeatedly voiced by official Baku.
Mirzoyan is completely right: the establishment of
diplomatic relations with Turkiye and the opening of the border are important
for Armenia, as is the further institutionalization of the established peace
with Azerbaijan. In Azerbaijan, they generally believe that Pashinyan's team,
as Mirzoyan says, is making sincere efforts. But we expect concrete results. In
the direction of unjustifiably prolonged implementation of the Zangezur
corridor, in the direction of removing toxic provisions from the Armenian
Constitution, mainly hindering the conclusion of peace. When all this happens,
all issues with Turkiye will be resolved by themselves.
Azerbaijan is more interested than many others in the early institutionalization of peace in the South Caucasus. He has many plans and projects, he looks to the future and does not make it dependent on the past. This approach is an incredible window of opportunity for Armenia. We've had enough conversations, it's time to finally get down to business.
Print version