|
Thus, they were surprised when Dr. Brown and two colleagues spotted a 600-milemile-wide icy world at a distance of eight billion miles that remained well outside the Kuiper belt even at the closest point in its orbit.
No one could convincingly explain how the object, which Dr. Brown named Sedna, got there, and the hope was that the discovery of more Sedna-like worlds would provide enlightening clues.
Instead, astronomers looked and found nothing, deepening the mystery.
Finally, in 2014, Chadwick Trujillo, who had worked with Dr. Brown on the Sedna discovery, and Scott S. Sheppard, an astronomer at the Carnegie Institution for Science in Washington, reported a smaller object in a Sedna-like orbit, always remaining beyond the Kuiper belt.
Dr. Trujillo and Dr. Sheppard noted that several Kuiper belt objects had similar orbital characteristics, and they laid out the possibility of a planet disturbing the orbits of these objects. “It was the best explanation we could come up with,” Dr. Trujillo said.
But the particulars of their proposed planet
did not explain what was in the sky, Dr. Brown said.
“The theorists didn’t really take it
seriously,” he said. “They figured it was all some observational effect. The
observers didn’t take it seriously, because they figured it was all some
theoretical thing they couldn’t understand.”
Still, the peculiarities of the orbits appeared
genuine. Dr. Brown said he and Dr. Batygin “sat down and beat our heads against
the wall for the last two years.”
First, they focused on the six objects in
stable orbits and disregarded others that had been recently flung out by
That made the picture clearer.
“They all point into the same overall
direction,” Dr. Batygin said. “This is in stark contrast with the rest of the
Kuiper belt.”
Besides the long odds of this alignment being
coincidental, Dr. Batygin said, this pattern would disperse over time.
That argued for the force of some unseen body
guiding Sedna and the others.
Dr. Batygin, a theorist, tried placing a planet
among them using computer simulations, which scattered some Kuiper belt
objects, but the orbits were not sufficiently eccentric.
Then he examined what would happen if a ninth
planet were looping outward in the opposite direction. That, Dr. Batygin said,
gave “a beautiful match to the real data.”
The computer simulations showed that the planet
swept up the Kuiper belt objects and placed them only temporarily in the
elliptical orbits. Come back in half a billion years, Dr. Brown said, and Sedna
will be back in the Kuiper belt, while other Kuiper belt objects will have been
pushed into elliptical orbits.
Another strange result in the simulations: A
few Kuiper belt objects were knocked into orbits perpendicular to those of the
planets. Dr. Brown remembered that five objects had been found in perpendicular
orbits.
“They’re exactly where we predicted them to
be,” he said. “That’s when my jaw hit my floor. I think this is actually
right.”
Dr. Morbidelli said a possible ninth planet could
be the core of a gas giant that started forming during the infancy of the solar
system; a close pass to Jupiter could have ejected it. Back then, the sun
resided in a dense cluster of stars, and the gravitational jostling could have
prevented the planet from escaping to interstellar space.
“I think they’re onto something real,” he said.
“I would bet money. I would bet 10,000 bucks.”
Dr. Brown said that he had begun searching for
the planet, and that he thought he would be able to find it within five years.
Other astronomers will most likely also scan that swath of the night sky.
If the planet exists, it would easily meet the
definition of planet, Dr. Brown said.
“There are some truly dominant bodies in the solar system, and they are pushing around everything else,” Dr. Brown said. “This is what we mean when we say planet.”