"Baku can serve as an example for modern Muslim states that aim to develop both economically and politically"
20 June 2011 [13:31] - TODAY.AZ
Interview with author of “Global Security Watch: The Caucasus States” book, Houman A. Sadri, Associate Professor of Political Science and Coordinator of UN Program at the University of Central Florida.
You mention security threats in the Caucasus region in your recent book, what are those threats currently?
As discussed in my recent book “the Global Security Watch: The
Caucasus States,” it is true that there is an external threat for each
one of the South Caucasus states. However, the most significant factors
in each case are internal threats to each country in the region. Such
internal threats include ethnic conflict, separatism, and economic
instability, as we have witnessed since their independence.
The US-Azerbaijani relations have been a hot topic for regional
analysts for a long time. How would you characterize Azerbaijan’s
importance for the US?
The Republic of Azerbaijan is a significant partner for the USA for at
least 3 major reasons: 1) Azerbaijan is a major oil producer for the US
allies in Europe; 2) Azerbaijan is a Muslim country that continually
works on its democracy, which is one of the major goals of the US for
all its allies; and 3) Baku can serve as an example for modern Muslim
states that aim to develop both economically and politically while they
separates state and religious affairs.
Another point in the US-Azerbaijani relations might be neighboring
Iran, according to some analysts. How do you see the role and place of
Azerbaijan and other post-soviet countries in the light of the nuclear
threat from Iran?
About Iranian nuclear energy plan, we should remember that Tehran’s
main goal is the survival of its regime. Iranian leaders witnessed the
US invasion of Saddam’s regime which did not have nuclear technology to
deter a Western invasion. Tehran leaders also observed that the US and
its allies have not invaded North Korea that has access to the nuclear
technology. In fact, the Western states often try to negotiate with the
unpopular North Korean regime. This reality has forced Iran to move as
fast as it can to access such a technology to deter any possible
invasions.
Moreover, Tehran has tried to stand as a protector of the weaker states
and promote anti- hegemonic policies in the region. There is no major
political benefit for Tehran to destroy the infrastructure of the
neighboring countries, which would contribute to unfavorable regional
climate among the masses against Iran. Moreover, I do not expect Tehran
to attack the infrastructure of any neighboring countries in the near
future, because that would provide a better excuse to the West to
organize a military campaign against the Islamic Republic.
Speaking of regional security, how possible do you see NATO’s
involvement in the South Caucasus? Can Azerbaijan and Georgia become
members of the alliance with the unsettled conflicts in their territory?
With the reactions of many EU states following the 2008 Russia-Georgia
War, I do not see that Georgia and Azerbaijan become NATO members in
the near future. However, I am sure that they can continue on the same
defense partnership programs that they had began with NATO states short
of becoming the official members of this alliance.
/APA/
Views: 1383
Connect with us. Get latest news and updates.