|
|
Norwegian politician Thorbjørn Jagland, who has recently
faced public scrutiny over reported contacts with Jeffrey Epstein, was
hospitalized following reports that the 75-year-old attempted suicide.
Against this backdrop, some commentators have revisited
Jagland’s historical role in Norwegian foreign policy and its impact on
relations between Azerbaijan and Norway.
In the late 1990s, bilateral relations between Baku and Oslo
were developing positively. In 1998, Norway opened its embassy in Baku, and
cooperation expanded, particularly in the energy sector, where Statoil (now
Equinor) began operations in Azerbaijan. Political and economic ties appeared
to be strengthening.
The situation shifted after Jagland returned to government
in 2000 as Norway’s Minister of Foreign Affairs. In 2002, Steinar Gil was
appointed Norway’s ambassador to Azerbaijan. His tenure in Baku became
controversial. Azerbaijani officials and lawmakers accused him of publicly commenting
on domestic political developments in a manner they considered inappropriate
for a diplomat.
Particular criticism arose around the events of 2003 on
Azadlig Square, when opposition protests took place following presidential
elections. Azerbaijani sources alleged that the ambassador’s visible presence
during the unrest signaled undue involvement in internal affairs. Further
tensions emerged when individuals accused by Azerbaijani authorities of serious
offenses reportedly sought refuge connected to diplomatic premises — a move
that intensified political friction.
As disagreements deepened, members of the Azerbaijani
parliament discussed declaring the ambassador persona non grata. In 2006,
Norway recalled Steinar Gil, later appointing him ambassador to Lithuania.
Meanwhile, Jagland continued his political career, serving
as Speaker of the Norwegian Parliament before becoming Secretary General of the
Council of Europe in 2009. During his tenure at the Council of Europe,
relations between Azerbaijan and the organization became increasingly strained.
Baku faced critical resolutions, monitoring procedures, and legal mechanisms
under the European Convention on Human Rights, including Article 52 inquiries
and the infringement procedure under Article 46.4 — the latter applied for the
first time in relation to Azerbaijan.
Supporters of Azerbaijan have argued that these steps
reflected a politically motivated approach, while the Council of Europe
maintained that its actions were grounded in human rights standards and legal
obligations.
The so-called “caviar diplomacy” allegations, which referred
to claims of lobbying and influence within the Parliamentary Assembly of the
Council of Europe, also contributed to tensions. Various figures, including
former diplomat Arif Mammadov, publicly commented on these issues in subsequent
years.
More recently, media reports have highlighted Jagland’s past
association with Jeffrey Epstein. According to investigative publications,
correspondence and travel records indicated that Jagland had contact with
Epstein and stayed at properties linked to him. These revelations have
generated renewed public debate in Norway and beyond.
Overall, the period marked a significant cooling of
Azerbaijani-Norwegian relations, culminating in Norway’s decision to close its
embassy in Baku in 2018. The interpretation of these events continues to differ
depending on political perspective, reflecting broader disagreements over
diplomacy, sovereignty, and human rights policy in Europe.
Print version